Search

Search Type:

Today's News and Humor
Strange Story About How Monopoly Games Help US Prisoners Escape Germany WWII
Top 10 Con Games Explained
11 Celebrities Who Overcame Dyslexia
World's Tallest Tsunami - 1720 Ft Tall!
Top 10 Adventure Travel Destinations



Special Images and Pictures
SM - MILITARY EQUIPMENT - ARMORED VEHICLES - TANKS - HUMVEES - ARTILLERY - BIG GUNS
SM - MILITARY EQUIPMENT - ALL SHIPS - BATTLESHIPS - FRIGATES - SUBS - TENDERS
SM - MILITARY EQUIPMENT - AIRCRAFT - JETS - FIGHTERS - ATTACK AIRCRAFT
SM - WORLD WAR II - ALL EQUIPMENT - Tanks - Airplanes & Ships - WW I - EQUIPMENT - MISC.
SM - MILITARY EQUIPMENT - AIRCRAFT CARRIERS - FLATTOPS


Strange Survey
ARE WE WINNING THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN?
 NO - IT'S A QUAGMIRE!
 WE NEED MORE TROOPS
 YES - BUT WE SHOULD BE MORE AGGRESSIVE
 YES - NO ONE SAID IT WOULD BE EASY
 
View Previous Surveys



Hong Kong Woman Sues Rolex, Claims Rash

Hong Kong Woman Sues Rolex, Claims Rash


Sept. 14, 2005


HONG KONG - A Hong Kong woman has sued Rolex, alleging that a watch she bought caused her psychological trauma because she had to wear long sleeves to cover up an itchy, unsightly skin allergy triggered by a label on the underside of the luxury timepiece, a newspaper reported Thursday.

Lee Ka-wai filed her claim in the Small Claims Tribunal, seeking $6,044 in damages, the South China Morning Post said. She purchased the $3,866 Rolex Oyster Perpetual in August 2004, the newspaper said.

Lee said the skin allergy - scratchy red dots - was caused by a removable label on the back of the watch, the newspaper reported. She didn't remove the label because she was afraid she would lose Rolex's worldwide guarantee or sacrifice proof of the watch's authenticity, it said.

"Rolex should have mentioned it in the manual or asked its agent to remind customers to remove the label," Lee was quoted as saying.

She said that she suffered psychological trauma because she had to wear long sleeves to cover up the unsightly allergic reaction, the newspaper reported.

The Post quoted Rolex official Daniel Neidhart as saying removing the label would not have affected the guarantee or the authenticity of the watch. He said the label merely showed that the watch was new and most customers removed it, the newspaper reported.

The case was adjourned until Oct. 26, the newspaper said.

Submitted by Lee
 





 

The Strange Family




© 2009 StrangeCosmos.com
Read our Privacy Policy
Photography

StrangeCosmos.com StrangeVehicles.com StrangeZoo.com StrangePolitics.com StrangePersons.com
StrangeSports.com StrangeCelebrities.com StrangeMilitary.com StrangeDangers.com StrangePolice.com
StrangeBusiness.com StrangeFunKidz.com StrangeTravel.com StrangeAmericans.com StrangeFarmer.com
StrangeCollege.com StrangeOldePictures.com StrangeRacer.com StrangeBlondes.com  

Disclaimer: We do our best to avoid copyrighted material. If anything on this site has been copyrighted by you, please contact us so we can remove it or give you credit!